Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(12): 3188-3190, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1496964

ABSTRACT

We used the incidence of spike gene target failures identified during PCR testing to provide an early projection of the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variant B.1.1.7 in a university setting in Texas, USA, before sequencing results were available. Findings from a more recent evaluation validated those early projections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Texas/epidemiology , Universities
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(35): 1201-1205, 2021 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1413254

ABSTRACT

Colleges and universities in the United States have relied on various measures during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, including implementing testing programs (1-3). These programs have permitted a safer return to campus for students by identifying infected persons and temporarily isolating them from the campus population (2,3). The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) implemented COVID-19 prevention measures in Fall 2020* including the following testing programs: clinic-based diagnostic testing, voluntary community screening, and targeted screening (testing of specific student populations in situations of increased transmission risk). During September 30-November 30, 2020, UT Austin students participated in tests for SARS-CoV-2, which resulted in the detection of 401 unique student cases of COVID-19 from among 32,401 tests conducted.† Among students who participated in one targeted screening program for students attending campus events, 18 (37.5%) of 48 infected students were asymptomatic at the time of their positive test result compared with 45 (23%) of 195 students identified through community testing and nine (5.8%) of 158 students identified through clinic-based testing. Targeted screening also identified a different population of students than did clinic-based and community testing programs. Infected students tested through targeted screening were more likely to be non-Hispanic White persons (chi square = 20.42; p<0.03), less likely to engage in public health measures, and more likely to have had interactions in settings where the risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission is higher, such as restaurants, gyms, and residence halls. In addition to clinic-based SARS-CoV-2 testing at colleges and universities, complementary testing programs such as community and targeted screening might enhance efforts to identify and control SARS-CoV-2 transmission, especially among asymptomatic persons and disproportionately affected populations that might not otherwise be reached.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/prevention & control , Mass Screening , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Students/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , Quarantine , Texas/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL